• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Eh I’m more concerned about whoever is still pushing nuclear these days.

    It’s a worse solution that takes longer and costs more to achieve what renewables and storage already can. It’s mainly wielded to attack renewables, and nothing ever gets done with it beyond that.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I disagree, I think nuclear is a half decent stop gap. Especially when noting renewables aren’t a universal perfect solution for every location. (IE not everywhere has good sun or wind). Doesn’t mean we should 100% move to nuclear, but the faster we can get rid of coal the better.