Also, While Landers and Goldman are both self professed zionests, Landers endorsed Mamdani and Goldman did not, and Landers has aligned himself with progressives, so working with Landers on common goals seems more likely.
I hope OP responds to clarify, but thank you for your theory of their cereal box.
Likely in reference to Zohran’s endorsement of Zionist Brad Landers in his attempt to primary Dan Goldman in NYC.
What’s Lina Kahn have to do with that?
Also, While Landers and Goldman are both self professed zionests, Landers endorsed Mamdani and Goldman did not, and Landers has aligned himself with progressives, so working with Landers on common goals seems more likely.
I hope OP responds to clarify, but thank you for your theory of their cereal box.
People are upset because Zohran ran with anti-zionism as a primary part of his campaign and he has seemingly not stayed the course there.
I’m also unsure what the rest of his transition team has to do with the whole thing and it feels like some of them are catching strays here lol