Smart TVs with an internet connection: Lets grab screenshots and send them to cooperate analysis advertisement department.

  • bruhbeans@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t get why people reflexively suggest streaming boxes. A standalone Roku, Onn or FireTV is gonna spy on you just as much as any of these things. Apple TV is probably the best of a bad bunch (esp. since Nvidia enshittified the Shield TV). There’s options like running the Shield with an alternate launcher or putting a ROM on the Fire stick or running A Linux STB but none of those are particularly accessible to the non-tech set.

    • JohnBrownsBawdy [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I guess I wasn’t meaning to recommend one over the other, I was curious what the value proposition of connecting your tv to the internet is. (The tv I have is at least ten years old and is incredibly sluggish even changing channels - I can’t imagine using the built in apps is any better. Same with our ancient Blu-ray player, just awful to use.) Or if there is no value prop and you’re forced (or nagged) to do so in order to use your tv.

      I assume that any sort of streaming is offering up a surveillance buffet. I just want to limit the data as best I can.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The usability of “smart” TVs is garbage. They arne’t very powerful computers so if you are going to sacrifice privacy by using streaming, you should do it with a better streaming device. There is no reason a TV needs to connect to the internet. There is nothing that needs to be updated.

    • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thank you. “I refuse to send my data to my tv company! Here, Apple, you take it instead.”