t’s certainly been a journey for Valve. A week prior to the Steam Frame’s launch, we spoke with two engineers at Valve about the project: Joy Lyons, hardware engineer, and Jeremy Selan, software engineer. The memory crisis and the price were a big part of that conversation. From that chat, we can confirm that Valve had aimed for a lower price point than the one it’s launching the Frame for today.

Here’s Lyons on the memory crisis:

“We set out to design this hardware with one particular price in mind, but we’ve made choices to make sure that we’re making a product that is choiceful, that people can purchase, they can upgrade with different features later. But we wanted to make sure we had a base product with really great performance. Then that price target shifted due to the ongoing RAM crisis around the world.”

Lyons also said that forecasting for the cost of certain components used in the Steam Frame is an ongoing challenge.

Not exactly boding well of the Steam Deck 2.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would probably me more inclined to listen to anything you say if you also acknowledged your mistakes

      • mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I’m not trying to convince anyone, I’m just tired of people simping for ARM like its better than x86. Apple and Qualcomm are not going to make gaming better!

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Ok but it’s weird that you aren’t acknowledging the things you were fundamentally wrong about, and were making a really big deal about

          Not sure how you can draw conclusions like that with big misunderstandings

          • mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            but I dont understand how calling raspbian a fork of Linux is incorrect. I can’t run mainline Linux on an android phone, I need to run something based on Linux that isn’t from Linus Torvalds, the owner of the Linux trademark.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Rasbian is not a fork of “Linux”. It is a distro that contains lots and lots and lots of open software. Including Linux. Just like Ubuntu and Alpine and Debian and Rocky and Neon and hundreds of other distros do.

              That distro is fully open .

              It includes an open, non-closed version of the Linux kernel.

              You can, and people absolutely do, use Linux from the Linux foundation, on tons of ARM hardware, including Raspberry Pis and other ARM-based general purpose computers

              Can I run desktop Ubuntu on my Motorola phone? No. But I can’t run it on a Kankun smart plug either, and that runs Linux. Ubuntu wasn’t designed to run on this hardware (though they did work a LOT on specific phone and tablet support). I also can’t run it on a Milk-V Duo, but it is Risc-V and runs “Linux”.

              Do many phone manufacturers do other things to lock down phones? Yes, but that has nothing to do with being ARM-based. And I was responding specifically to the ARM claims.

              • mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Go to github.com/torvalds/linux

                click “fork”

                You now have a fork of Linux.

                You’re probably allowed by the trademark holder to still call it Linux, but its not associated with the official Linux kernel project.

                The problem with ARM is that all of the hardware manufacturers lock down their hardware or othwise make it difficult to use with mainline Linux. That was all I was saying. I wouldn’t want to game on a MilkV Duo either.

                • ripcord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  By that measure there are very very few Linux systems running Linux. Most distros ship their own slightly customized fork.

                  All of the [ARM] hardware manufacturers make it difficult to use with mainline Linux

                  No, they do not all do that

                  And it has nothing to do with ARM vs x86 or Risc-V which was your original core point

    • eurodyne@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Also, Android is linux, lol. Just because some phone models don’t allow you the freedom to build-from-source doesn’t change any of that.

        • eurodyne@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Ahahahahahah! No, no no no. None of that is true. Nor has it ever been true

          😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

          Have you ever tried stand-up comedy? I think you might be quite good at it— in the Trump-idiot garbage bin circuit