• Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    All roads eventually end up at Arch. And then some people get lost in the misty Nix Forest. Some never find their way out.

    • Farooq
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I went from Ubuntu to Debian, then to Arch, then to Alpine. Can’t wait to move off from Linux completely to get a kernel with a sane democratic management.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, some of us land on Gentoo from the beginning, and then watch the Arch people act like teens who think they’re edgy. 😜

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Arch users think they’re… “edgy”? Honestly, if I had the patience to wait for compilation when upgrading, I’d run Gentoo as well. Arch for me was the next best thing in terms of making the system “my own”. I mostly feel in love with the packaging system of Arch and how easy it was to make my own packages. Great stuff.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s cool. What does Gentoo do better than Arch in your opinion? Any category! 🙂

            • cadekat@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I haven’t used Arch in a long time, but from what I remember…

              Arch and Gentoo are both rolling releases, but Gentoo is rolling stable while Arch is bleeding edge.

              If you game, you can’t beat being able to drop kernel patches in a folder and have them applied on every update. Works for all packages, not just the kernel.

              GURU has a bit more oversight than the AUR, but not as many packages.

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m thinking Arch is definitely for me, then:

                • I prefer bleeding edge. No delay, things haven’t broken my system in a decade, seems like it’s fine for personal use anyway.
                • I don’t need any kernel patches as a heavy gamer, my system can run whatever you throw at it.
                • The AUR seems to have a far simpler and less convoluted process for contributing than GURU.

                Still, I’m curious: what kernel patches do you feel the need to apply, as a gamer?

                • cadekat@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  You can enable the bleeding edge too, if you like. The repos have multiple versions of packages.

                  I need the bigsceen beyond patches for better VR support.

                  I’ve never contributed to the AUR, so I can’t really compare. GURU does have a bit of process in exchange for some oversight, but there are completely unmoderated overlays too.

                  That’s completely fair! I think pacman is a much nicer to use package manager than emerge, and Arch has a great community :3