• kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s centralized, it doesn’t officially allow 3rd-party clients, it requires a phone number, and the desktop app kinda sucks. I use it anyway, but it could be better.

    • Confetti Camouflage@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I don’t know about other people, but the only thing I don’t like about Signal is that it is centralized. It seems to be the only option to actually get everything right for security though from what I hear.

      • Soatok Dreamseeker@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        That’s a reasonable thing to dislike about it.

        I dislike that I can’t reply to another message with a sticker.

        I also dislike that, despite having admin access, I can’t delete abusive messages left in groups for anyone but myself. That makes it unsuitable for building communities.

    • Allah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      You need a phone number for Signal which means that your mobile provider will have your location, your IMSI, your mobile device model, serial number if you are using a T-Mobile or any other Telco" supplied device.

      If not then via the IMSI / mobile number they can get your location and details from Google / Apple etc and that not even considering your IP-Address

      Any time that there is a unique real world identifier the owner can be located. The only way around this would be to use something like Briar that use cryptographic uniqueness and that communicates via Onion like multihop anonymizers (TOR etc) from the outset.