• 377 Posts
  • 537 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2025

help-circle




  • Sounds novel. To gain any significant adoption it would need a proper install package where users do not need to run scrips or compile anything to use it, Just a simple flatpak or appimage. This is where BasicSwap failed, 99.9% of people could never even install it. It would also need the ability to run only using remote nodes.

    Make sure to include support for BCH, it is growing in popularity fast as the real Bitcoin.







  • Insightful write-up. Honestly I am pretty excited about LLM assisted coding especially when it comes to BCH based apps. It will accelerate development dramatically. Take BCHNoster for example, the app has been out for like a two months and it already is feature rich. In the past it would take years to develop something like this.















  • CashDragonOPMAtoInfographicsThe Lindy Effect
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    BCH has CashFusion which makes it extremely difficult to trace, almost as good as Monero. You get the best of both worlds, great privacy and a audit-able ledger, which sound money requires. (https://bitcoiniscash.org/bitcoin-cash-privacy/)

    Monero loses out to BCH because it does not scale and has bad UX. The last stress test showed Monero fails @ 700k TX per day. With problems starting ~300-500k from my experience. (https://realbitcoin.cash/post/51283)

    A large spam attack can take down Monero, also if it ever reached high TX volume the fees would be just as high as BTC. Monero Avg. TX fee is 0.00027 XMR ($0.1), Avg. BCH TX fee is 0.000017 BCH ($0.0064). Monero is too expensive to transact on mass, it is a niche coin for extreme privacy.

    Monero also has no scripting ability, it can barely do proper multisig. BCH is a much better solution and will dominate going forward. Monero was a good experiment but has no potential for mass adoption.