DebatableRaccoon

Precisely. It’s easy to give oneself the moral high ground when the hill you choose to die on costs significantly less in time, effort and money. Helping real people is far too expensive but if you make yourself sound like a humanitarian by defending fictional people then that’s pretty cost-effective.

Take your upvote and get out.

Because to the black and white people out there it’s bad that a child can come to any amount of harm no matter how fictional those children may be. It’s a similar trend to the old anti-game movement because these people believe the sort of person who picks up a digital AK47 and clip dumps some NPCs is the sort of person who would do the same in real life and thus shouldn’t be able to in any capacity, as if removing an entirely fake playground stems true homicidal rage and definitely doesn’t point to failed parenting in teaching consequence or genuine mental illness.

Quality-assurance workers? At Bethesda? I thought they were a myth. The games certainly don’t reflect them existing.

Same with Rise of the Ronin. I know that one’s not developed or published by Sony but it is a previous PS exclusive to not land the transition well so I’m hoping it’s not a sign for ports to come.

Lack of optimisation. The spec requirements alone point this out but then they still commonly run like garbage.

Took long enough.

In fhe same way you can voice your opinion, someone else can voice why it’s flawed, why people should look at a project like this and point out why people should just regurgitate the same old “AI slop” venom. Putting those points forward isn’t being mean-spirited, it’s highlighting the nuance around a topic and adding more to the conversation than “tis gud”/“tis bad” without being a personal attack so there’s no need to go on the defensive either.

Get out. Well done but get out and take your upvote with you.

My personal issue with it was a general lack of optimisation. Granted that was the demo so things could have changed but if even the demo runs poorly, I don’t consider it a good sign.

Then don’t buy anything. In the meantime I’ll keep pursuing more of a franchise that I love, especially when HL is the only good thing we’ve had in quite some time.

Art versus artist. Some of us what as much of the wizarding world as we can get.

Translation: “The executive’s felt their yearly bonus wouldn’t be big enough come the end of the financial year so they found a way to free up some extra funds.”

I mean in the way that if you close the game mid-run, it nukes your whole save.

So far I’d say The Chinese Room has got a decent rep so… 🤞

Just watch it launch on April 1st and turn out to be mid-run ironman saves.

Exactly. All of that time and effort could be going towards a game I’d prefer to play and wouldn’t be susceptible to takedowns.

And all the other games that entice underage gambling?

That’s just Square Enix coding. All of their games are flops by their records.

Fuck Discord