Imagine trying to explain the concept of authority like a dipshit and then end it with an accusation of racism.

Could never be me lmao.

I’m well aware that the British and US lead a coup to reinstall the Shah, which ultimately caused the Iranian Revolution. Islamic fundamentalism was definitely not the answer.

Authoritarian Islamic fundamentalism.

That would be true for the 2000 election as well, but Democrats didn’t fight the SC decision and so we got two expensive wars in the subsequent 8 years that some democrats even supported, demonstrating their fascist sympathies.

Lemmy is full of people who want to actually discuss ways to have a better world, unlike you it seems lmao.

You’re trying to argue the status quo to people who saw what the status quo was since Reagan, but you still don’t get it.

I’m so glad my consistent votes for democrats over my life have definitely not lead me to the precipice of fascism… oh wait.

That’s fair. As someone related to the science field, I am skeptical of police (anything, but especially their) ability to investigate things like this.

I have had Excel delete information from datasheets and have received data where cells were changed to dates because someone opened up the file in Excel. It seems like that was a sticking point in the article.

Unsurprisingly, she did half this shit to process samples faster which speaks to the systemic problem of underfunded and overworked scientists.

Lots of incriminating quotes in the article from the investigation quoting Woods. She needed to learn to shut the fuck up.

They are both things to aspire to, but you’re right in that one does not lead to the other.

I mean posts

I think you mean high art