

Some of them certainly are Wahabi-aligned jihadists. If most in Syria are, that’s news to me, but I’m sure that few in China are.
All text lovingly hand-crafted with 100% organic em dashes.
| Pronouns | he/him |
| Datetime Format | RFC 3339 |


Some of them certainly are Wahabi-aligned jihadists. If most in Syria are, that’s news to me, but I’m sure that few in China are.
You have no sources, no points. You vaguely gesture to “atrocities” and “officials living above the law,” without any concrete examples. I give numerous facts and statistics, the blog post I linked is a compilation of peer reviewed studies and other metrics.
TBF, on Reddit they never needed facts, studies, or evidence to browbeat and win fake internet points.


The Uyghurs, btw.
btw, previously:
The US tried to foment division in China by funding and organizing Salafi terrorist into Xinjiang, and once its efforts failed, it made lemonade out of its lemon by concocting and promoting a genocide narrative.
The only countries pushing this narrative are the “always the same map” imperial core countries, which just so happen to be largely the same ones supporting Israel’s genocide.
Almost no predominantly-Muslim country buys the Uyghur genocide narrative, because they know it’s bullshit, because they talked to the Uyghurs themselves.
https://twitter.com/un_hrc/status/1578003299827171330 #HRC51 | Draft resolution A/HRC/51/L.6 on holding a debate on the situation of human rights in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of #China, was REJECTED.
- The Uyghur Human Rights Project is a product of the National Endowment for Democracy, which is the American government’s main regime change NGO.
- A Reddit AMA Claiming To Be A Uyghur Quickly Exposes A CIA Asset Slandering China
- The Xinjiang Genocide Allegations Are Unjustified
- Uyghur genocide allegations
- American Debunks All Major Western Propaganda on Uyghurs and Xinjiang
- US-Funded Uyghur Activists Train as Soldiers of Empire
- The blueprint of regime change operations How regime change happens in the 21st century with your consent
NATO countries are not “the rest of the world.” Previously.
You know that Korean forces were only involved in pushing back the Kursk incursion, which ended eight months ago, right?
We eat what we can and what we can’t we can.
Doubling down on feigned obtuseness, I see.
You can take the girl out of Reddit, but can’t take the Reddit out of the girl.
The same numerically. You’re not that obtuse, so is this a joke or are you a cringey debatelord?
social justice warriors
Okay boomer.


Not sure—I haven’t read any fascist manifestos. Maybe Blackshirts and Reds.
Dugin isn’t “Putin’s Brain” any more than Navalny was, but he is popular with some US & European fascists.


There are already dozens of decent feed aggregators, and I’m not interested in Lemmy tacking on functionality that’s superfluous to social media. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_feed_aggregators
Or do you mean follow or block posted links to sites? That functionality already partially exists at the admin level. We can block posts of URLs to specific domains. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4514
There’s already a ticket for per-user URL blocklists: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4689
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
— A.A. member https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/03/23/same/



When Imperial forces take out your sandcrawler.


I believe we need dedicated spaces for political discussion that are not based on algorithms optimized for engagement (aka outrage).
So do we, which is one of the reasons why Lemmy was created, and why Lemmy does not have algorithms for rage engagement. Lemmy is all cost and no revenue, so there is no financial incentive for it to “maximize ‘engagement.’”
The first is a way to limit bots or bad actors from participating in discussions.
Where are the actually-existing the “bot problems” on Lemmy? While it could happen, I don’t think it actually is happening to any significant extent presently.





Yeah, this is community rule 2. I’ll leave this up, but please refrain in the future, @ExtremeDullard@piefed.social.
Those states owning the means of production is exactly why bourgeois states call them authoritarian. The bourgeoisie are supposed to own the MoP, not the state.
Perhaps, of the Uyghurs you’ve met, this is true, but how many native-Xinjiang Uyghurs have you met? This sounds like a gross over-generalization. I’m sure that some of them are as atheist as you, me, and the CPC.