Are they not? I’m a russian language speaker in Thailand right now and everyone who’s not an obedient fool has escaped long time ago or became an obedient slave.
1.5m people either dead or disabled by the war, economy on the brink of collapse, completely outcast from the cosmopolitan world - is that not obedient slavery?
Russia’s potential economy is much bigger though:
Yes, immutable linux can be made much safer. With overlays none of the projects compete for config so agents are much less likely to introduce bugs and access important context by accident basically just by reading explicit immutable configs. We’re rolling everything on nixos now and it’s really good. Immutable linux has basically won imo.
Attention is currency
It’s not just a program it’s a movement. It has budget of 13m usd that comes from corporations who have maybe 0.01% of their user base on linux. Why do you think that is? Why would 1Password and friends do this?
It comes with claude.md and some skills. Basically nothing you can’t setup in 15 minutes and a claude prompt on any linux distribution yourself. They claim “because omarchy is just text configs llms understand it very well” when all linux and all distributions are configured through text.
Agentic linux is awesome though but you’d bave to be brain damaged to do it on mutable distro.
Donate to KDE and Gnome and your favorite linux programs!
13M USD budget “distro” btw
Sure but again this is only a problem if copyright exists. Stallman himself invented GPL due to frustrations of copyright. The permisiveness is default human behavior that was corrupted by evil people and terrible systems. The neutrrance of copyright just returns us to this default state of sharing.
Sure but that’s mostly irrelevant in practice now. Gpl was notoriously unenforced so this aspect of “getting source code” almost never yielded to much in practice. FSF did a great job with limited resources it has but as code copyright is basically gone now and reverse engineering is so accessible we can actually empower real free software that is fully transparent and verifiable. If you imply that somehow we’ll start regressing existing tools to proprietary software I don’t see that at all.
Copyleft exists only because of copyright. If there is no copyright there’s no longer a need for copyleft.
Why? The entire purpose of GPL is to counteract copyright. If there is no copyright we no longer need GPL either.
Hot take: LLMs is the best thing has happened to open source movement:
We’re literally in the golden age of free software
It’s just braindead luddites throwing meme words
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory
They think thay they will exit rich and leave some other bigger idiot with the bag. It’s gambling.
Every cover by Scary Pockets is incredible like sweet child o’ mine
They’re auto approved. Automation is not only a money saving strategy but a product strategy more si.
At the end of the day this is direct policy of Meta and they should be directly responsible for all harms ads create.
I genuinely don’t understand how anyone could argue otherwise - if one has a billboard above their house and put some CSAM on there they would be in prison. But not Meta? Who’s going to prison for this?
I care what my computer does the same way I care about what my brain does. Since my computer is just an extension of my brain it needs to be transparent and ownable.
Stays behind when crisis hit? The crisis is of their own doing. Russia is a rotten country and a rotten culture that has no one else to blame.
I generally don’t like destructive change like revolution but Russians will never recover, never. The culture is so far gone and so broken and so passive that the best thing that could happen to an average russian is complete dissolution of the entire Russian project into independent smaller states.