The license they’re looking for may not exist at all, but at the very least doesn’t exist within the Creative Commons world. They specifically don’t want attribution back to them to be required, and attribution at minimum is part of all the ‘traditional’ CC licenses. Deselecting attribution from the CC chooser forces you into a public domain license, which will allow anyone to do commercial stuff or charge for it, the other thing they don’t want.

Stop, I can only get so wet.

Which other faucets?

Dang I thought this was linuxmemes for a sec.

I did too, for multiple secs, no joking. Capitalize proper nouns (outside of a terminal), folks!

Apps exist that have you place the phone next to you on the mattress so the accelerometer can track your movement, while the mic tracks snoring and such.

I feel like it’s yet another a thinly-veiled rant disguised as a question. Which is not to say I disagree with their premise, but there has to be a better community for this soapbox stuff.

When naming something, not only should you make sure it clearly describes the thing but doesn’t describe anything else. “AI pollution” sounds just as much like something that pollutes AI (for example, training it with false information), much like how “air pollution” is stuff that pollutes air.

For starters, do you know if your laptop does S3 sleep or S0? I feel like the latter introduces a lot of uncertainty.

Another vote for Thunder, though I’m also kind of warming up to Summit.

photorec

Activity lights are useful! Try a layer (or two, or three) of matte-finish transparent tape to turn down the brightness a bit.

And what’s with all the upvotes?

No true nerdsman intensifies

I miss those “pebble” watches.

Great news for ya.

Obsidian is proprietary.

I’m not OP, I just read the post.

They’re insecure about it. I feel sad for them.

I don’t think they were using glue yet. You just use a plastic pry tool to get the case open.

In an interview or something, a bunch of years ago.

Today on “read the rest of the comments”…