On desktop, using testing + manufacturer repos is fine. Don’t use repos intended for other distributions.
On desktop, using testing + manufacturer repos is fine. Don’t use repos intended for other distributions.
Thanks for providing the additional clarifications, I think pretty much all of it is valid, I just have a slightly different perspective.
Most people would likely agree with you that investing into a home through dept is reasonable. I don’t disagree.
I also agree that you can utilize loaned capital in a way that your earnings outperform the debt incurred.
You’re still gambling though. You can not afford to lose your home, or that loaned capital. Maybe you feel like your chances are good, and maybe they really are, but you’re relying on your personal prediction of the future to ultimately resolve that debt.
A “real” investment is just as much gambling, but the fallout from failure is entirely different.
Garbage blocking garbage. Fuck Reddit
Just FYI for whoever needs to read this: If you go into debt for a single investment, it’s a mistake. You are supposed to invest your excess, into as many isolated pools as reasonable. If you’re part of the majority of the population, which doesn’t have an excess, you are not investing - you are gambling.
This reads like an angry response to what Proton has been doing very recently.
Take a moment to reflect how you started to use their services. Really think about what you thought at the time about them being the right service for your needs.
Did anything really change for you, other than thinking your porn download history is now as safe as Nazi gold in Switzerland?
Take the next step, and don’t look back.
Makes sense. If you’re contributing less than $1000 monthly to anything, you’re not making a difference. If you want dedicated people to be on the receiving end, who also do a great job, every single person will cost thousands each month. Wikimedia is literally spending millions each year.
Honestly, don’t try to hunt for the “best” spot to contribute your exact amount of spare money to, with the hope of having the largest possible impact. It won’t happen. Treat a good friend to some food instead.
If you really feel like you already got some value out of a service in the past, give what you can, without limiting yourself financially in the process. If you feel like you don’t have the $1 to spend for Wikipedia, don’t spend it. Don’t guilt trip yourself into donations ever. Your donation today will not prevent a service from turning into shit tomorrow. Pay for what you got
I’ve been a funding member of the Wikimedia Foundation for over a decade. I have looked at their finances several times before and during financing them.
As with a lot of similar non-profits, a considerable amount of donations does not go into “running the servers”. You have to judge this by yourself, but they don’t embezzle any money and there is a reasonable bottom line. Wikipedia continuously helps tons of people, and the people who run the operation enable that.
You can download a full dump of Wikipedia any day. Compared to other lying companies, they have been true on their promises for some time.
Of all the $1 I could spend in a year, the one I give to Wikipedia is probably the least wrong invested, and that $1 actually already makes a difference
I’d claim it’s the other way around until proven otherwise. Configuring the edge is not for everyone
Have you heard about Tor?