Nik282000

For projects that matter, like an OS, or networking tools, I do not trust slop. But this sounds like a recompiler, ROM goes in, native executable comes out, the majority of the code originates from the ROM and unless they were playing extra fast and loose there shouldn’t be too many places for malicious or vulnerable code to hide.

But also, fuck Nintendo, they make Epic look like the EFF.

this time it’s different

yeah and

they’ll never elect him twice

Do they realize that what they really said was: having shareholders destroys businesses.

About 1/3 of my bot hits have been from MS hosting since the summer. Fuck 'em. 30 years is enough.

I’ve got my original install (copied 500 times) running in DosBox and UT:GOTY from the Old Unreal project.

man find tells me that you should be using the -exec flag should be used if you want to do some operation on the files you find one at a time, using man to learn about a tool before you use it is also the Unix Way. (It also mentions the --delete flag as well as the gotchas that come along with using it).

I will agree that for some complicated tasks that a lot of users might want to do a lot of times, for example downloading videos from YouTube, all encompassing tools are are good idea. yt-dlp has hundreds of functions to cover all the things a user might want to do, but even it relies on outside tools like ffmpeg to get the job done.

Tyrian and UT:GOTY were two of the greatest games to come out of the 90’s.

For the single case where a user wants to find then delete a bunch of files, the --delete flag makes sense, but having the function of find overlap with the function of rm adds complexity to the codebase of find without matching the feature set of find + rm.

You’re gonna think I’m a asshole but, chaining find and rm seems like the best way because you get to keep all the options of rm instead of having only the less flexible option of -deleting every match.

Writing a tool that does only one thing looks like avoiding the most complicated task. Which leads to a conclusion that the Unix way only works well in a rather small fraction of use cases; the majority of cases are better served by different approaches.

The alternative to do-one-thing is do-lots-of-things.

Users very often need results that can only be achieved after doing several things. With only single-purpose tools at hand, users have to integrate them. In other words, the tool authors delegate integration to the users.

You describe a need for all-singing, all-dancing solutions over single use tools.

My github account is a warcrime, everything I know I have learned from running Debian, reading wiki’s, and stealing code from stack overflow.

Qualification: I am a certified moron, I used nano as my IDE for 8 years because I did not know about VS code. I still structure my python like the qbasic I learned in school. I have never mastered object oriented thinking.

Write your scrips one chunk at a time, make them modular, make intermediate scripts if you have to, and have each part output a data structure that you nail down early in the project. Having a ass-load of little parts chained together means you can tweak or entirely replace tools at a later date without fucking the whole process.

If your project is a monolithic do-all be-all monster it means even the tiniest change involves reevaluating your entire codebase. You’re giving yourself all the problems of cuckcoding with none of the time savings.

Been using LibreOffice for at least a decade now, OpenOffice before that and I’ve always been satisfied. I’m not a power user but for the 2 spreadsheets I make a month it works great.

It’s an older meme but it checks out.

Drives playtime up and keeps people on the Steam platform.

Yet so many execs and devs think they are super intelligent.

Most people are dumb. They wont research anything, particularly when it agrees with what they already think (AI hype headlines). As long as the news keeps saying LLMs are the future of code and hacking, and, and, and, most people will just agree.

Totp with a backup of the secrets/seed qr stored in a kdbx. If my phone melts it’s a 24hr problem at most.

The the account is still as vulnerable as a password.

Maintenance at a blast furnace. I am exposed to acidic vapours, caustic vapours, ambient heat in the 60c range, radiant heat in the 1000c range, rock from the nanometer up to 30cm size, phenolic resins, oil mists, and metal powders. And then there’s the crawling around over, under, and between equipment.

Not every tech-savvy person works in an office.

ok.

How do you add a new device to your account without a password or the old device?