queermunist she/her

/u/outwrangle before everything went to shit in 2020, /u/emma_lazarus for a while after that, now I’m all queermunist!

  • 0 Posts
  • 177 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle




  • You can’t dismantle systems of oppression without liquidating the oppressors.

    We didn’t end slavery by asking nicely, it took a civil war. Then, because we didn’t kill every slave owner and seize all of their wealth, they just reconstituted themselves as landlords. They defeated Reconstruction, regained power, rehired all their old slaves back as sharecroppers, and the oppression continued. The old slave catchers just became police, and they rounded up Black people and then put them on chain-gangs to be slaves for the State. Even today we have prison slaves working the fields.

    If every slave owner was hanged and their family’s wealth redistributed to their former slaves, none of this would have happened.

    If you don’t oppress the oppressors they just come back and resume their oppression. You have enemies. Start acting like it.



  • Not printing money is also bad for existing money. Deflation is a very bad thing.

    It’s supply and demand, and supply creates its own demand. That’s why the US economy grew so fast and became the reserve currency after it got off of the gold standard, it no longer had to be constrained by the limitations of gold and could just print whatever it needed. As long as there is demand, the supply can grow. When the supply grows, demand grows with it.

    You can’t just print infinite money, but it’s a lot looser than you seem to think. There’s plenty of money left.

    They just hate their citizens and want them to suffer.





  • It’s complicated. Only a few companies can afford to pay out bribes to avoid lawsuits, which means they’d effectively be destroying all of their competition in exchange. Bluesky and Lemmy can’t afford to pay their way out of lawsuits, after all. This would be a handy win for total monopolization of the internet under only a few companies, even if it might also be expensive.

    On top of that they were starting down the barrel of FTC for monopoly practices, I wouldn’t be surprised if there was some kind of backroom deal with the government here. Maybe if the tech companies allow Section 230 to be repealed and for age-verification laws to pass, the government doesn’t force their companies to be broken up in antitrust actions.

    I have no idea what is going to happen.