May be in the fictional universe of Batman he attempts to be morally good, but I believe that there is no morally good billionaire regardless of the circumstances, so it seems to me an attempt to justify them in some particular cases, yet I think that it cannot hold that such concentration of power and resources can be morally good in a whole society ethos, the good tyrant only rises by unplanned luck and resolves immediately in wise redistribution, it cannot sustain in time.
sircac
The entity formerly known as Quantum Device trying to swim the fediverse…
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 9th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Isn’t it all about having pleasant fun together?
sircac@lemmy.worldto
Funny@sh.itjust.works•In Finland, they advertise the largest container of mayonnaise as "American Size"
2·4 months ago…and that’s an accurate adjective
…a pack of remotes gather during mating session

I still find a better ethos for everybody to redistribute all, you and the other billionares you want to be safe of (and that the rest of us would not while you would be). Try out experiments out of curiosity not only can even damage collaterally others, it may even be flawed by design and serve no real purpose, or at least not efficiently… regardless of your good faith, control all the details of a huge amount of resources by one person is impossible, and if delegate in usage, chances of bad actors and oportunists be attracted to will still create havoc at a big scale… and if you just block those resources and not use them fear of lack of control, then is a terrible waste to begin with… I still stick to redistribution