I got my firefly petunias from light.bio around a month or so ago and they’re now just starting to take off. This picture was taken in a dark room with no windows, though I’m sure the phone brightened it up a bit. They aren’t as bright as I was imagining, but I still find them neat.

@houseplants

#plants #flowers

  • grober_Unfug@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Probably very unpopular opinion. I don’t get it how you could buy genetically modified plants.

    -unpredictable impact on ecosystems

    -uncontrolled spread through insects/seed

    -no long term studies available

    I really wish people would be more responsible with our environment.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      depends on your definition of genetically modified. you’d be hard pressed to find any plant that hasn’t been selectively bred, spliced and adapted by humans.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s a disingenuous argument. You can’t selectively breed an completely foreign gene into an organism. I can’t believe this even has to be said, but I guess the GMO lobby gets to people more than I thought.

              • Doxatek@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                I mean yeah if you can cause a specific selective pressure for the fluorescence trait and then breed the plant for 100 million years I guess you have a shot haha

                Those fish are definitely badass though

                It’s crazy how even though the process will take that long theoretically I can make this gene insertion in a single day with modern transformation and gene editing tools

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  You can shave off most of that 100 million years using variation breeding. No need to wait around for random chance to happen or to fiddle with genes manually when a little radiation can trigger as many mutations as we want.

                  • Doxatek@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 hours ago

                    It’s still random chance. But you are of course right that you would get them faster than possible in what’s typically considered natural.

                    No one really does this anymore though. Of course you can’t select the radiation induced mutation or where or how many or how large or what you want it to do. Most give nothing useful whatsoever if they aren’t just outright killed by the mutation.

                    You just would have to do literally billions of them and see if you can observe any type of desirable phenotype because there’s no realistic way to do sequencing on that many.

                    Many traits are not regulated by single genes but on long pathways involving multi gene networks. These are complex and make it even more unlikely to obtain in any reasonable amount of time adding another layer of complexity

                    If you want a plant to glow and all you’re doing hypothetically is irradiating them I think it would take much longer than you may initially expect.

                    Thank you for the enjoyable discussion by the way :)

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          No one lobbied me lol. They cross bred a petunia with a mushroom. It’s roughly the same concept as when humans bred maize.

          • Doxatek@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not really. They transformed plant cells in a lab with GFP from a mushroom and established a stable transgenic line. This can’t be done without modern techniques. Not the same as breeding them

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            No they didn’t crossbred it. Fungi and plants are so far apart in the tree of life that suggesting this is ludicrous. You can’t get a fungal spore and place it in a petunia’s flower and get a hybrid.

            DNA manipulation in a lab and selective breeding are fundamentally different. It’s silly to try to compare both.

    • artifex@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think it’s a fair concern in general but fine in this case since the company almost certainly edited in the lux operon which is one of the most well studied and understood gene switches out there. It and similar pathways have been used in many branches of science for decades. I think the novelty here is just that it’s in a consumer product instead.

      • grober_Unfug@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Some GMOs are approved and released before we fully understand their long-term ecological or health impacts. While short-term studies may show no harm, ecological processes unfold over decades.

        Another thing is that introducing glowing flowers might make genetic modification seem harmless or trivial. This could lead to less critical public debate and a gradual erosion of caution in how such technologies are used.

      • Doxatek@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        In each seed this gene would segregate some wouldn’t express at all, some lower and if you did it more times more than likely the mutation would be lost

          • Doxatek@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If the trait or edit is homozygous and you self pollinate the plant the trait will not be segregated out. If it is heterozygous you will get a mix.

            When transforming plants you can get hetero or homozygous edits both. I am unsure the genotype of the firefly petunias though.

            So if the edit is homozygous it is known as a pure line.

      • j4yt33@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think the concern is more about cross-pollination, not seeds from the plant directly