りん〜@sopuli.xyz to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 days agoIsn't brave supposed to be "private"?imagemessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up1274arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1262arrow-down1imageIsn't brave supposed to be "private"?りん〜@sopuli.xyz to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square77linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 day agoDepends on what you mean by “private”. I would not trust it much, but it’s not a bad Chromium based browser when you need one. Use something like LibreWolf for much more privacy out of the box.
minus-squaremonovergent@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day agoFor the best privacy when you do need a Chromium-based browser, the ungoogled-chromium flatpak is an excellent choice.
minus-squarepound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agoI vaguely remember some issues with extensions in ungoogled chromium. Maybe I should give it another shot.
Depends on what you mean by “private”. I would not trust it much, but it’s not a bad Chromium based browser when you need one. Use something like LibreWolf for much more privacy out of the box.
For the best privacy when you do need a Chromium-based browser, the ungoogled-chromium flatpak is an excellent choice.
I vaguely remember some issues with extensions in ungoogled chromium. Maybe I should give it another shot.