Saw this in my adguard home query logs.

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve never really had a comfortable feeling about Brave. I have no substantiating evidence, it just seems a bit squirrely. Besides the Tor browser, LibreWolf, Waterfox, and FireFox are the only acceptable browsers as far as I’m concerned, tho I don’t come down on those seeking an alternative to Google Chrome.

        • irmadlad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          General practice, I do not use my phone as a compute platform. I realize others cannot do the same all the time. I do run firefox and a VPN which has an adblocker as part of it’s tool set.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use Vivaldi, it’s IMHO the only decent Chromium browser, apart European, with a good privacy, no logs, no tracking no third party investors. great services and community.

  • NinjaTurtle@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Don’t a lot of browsers by default have pings set up to track usage? Check the privacy section. There is usually a check box about sending daily pings to whatever company made the browser to track usage.

    Not sure about the variations though

  • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Just use Firefox for gods sakes, Brave is a complete joke of a browser especially when it comes to privacy.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, doing any kind of digging into Brave will immediately send up warning flares that the privacy claims are pure fluff. Just use Firefox or Librewolf.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No. At least not in the way most people expect.

    It does block some tracking and ads that Chrome alone allows or explicitly adds. But it simply shifts that tracking to Brave. The idea was that you’d still get the benefits of that tracking by giving all of your data to Brave instead. I honestly never was convinced by this considering your data is still being sold, just by a different company so it doesn’t sound much better to me. Supposedly, according to them, Brave is more trustworthy and gives you more control over what they track and sell, but I don’t trust that business model. There’s no real incentive for them to do what they said they would.

      • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        It gets pushed often by reactionaries as an “anti-woke” browser LOL its a complete piece of shit. It’s got crypto, tracking, NFTs, AI and ads baked in. Literally everything I hate about the tech industry rolled up into one package. I’d rather use Chrome, even.

        • irmadlad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          anti-woke

          I find it quite interesting those who protest being woke. The word ‘woke’ has a long standing meaning to the Black community. The usual suspects using the word ‘anti-woke’ are almost always American Republicans, and their track record of racial animosity has preceded itself for generations like the stench of a rotting corpse. Given the choice between being woke or asleep, I’ll take woke any day.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That’s the lie they try to sell you.

    I swear Brave ran a very successful guerrilla marketing campaign and it succeeded on Reddit. If you so much as question it or suggest an alternative, you get dogpiled on by Brave bros. I don’t trust it one bit. I’ll stick to FF and its forks.

    • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, haven’t they done a ton of shady shit? I always cringe when people recommend the Brave browser. It’s like recommending a free VPN.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Brave is a protection racket wrapped in a cryptocurrency scam, created by a bigoted fuckwit. It is fractally shit.

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Apparently Brave’s got some cryptocurrency components, so I guess that’s where the cult-like following is.

  • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Depends on what you mean by “private”. I would not trust it much, but it’s not a bad Chromium based browser when you need one. Use something like LibreWolf for much more privacy out of the box.

    • monovergent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For the best privacy when you do need a Chromium-based browser, the ungoogled-chromium flatpak is an excellent choice.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You can disable this in the settings. Nobara ships with Brave now but with all of the telemetry and crypto BS turned off out of the box.

    • dajoho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s a shame this is necessary, to be honest. It’s the same argument with Windows users: “you can just run a debloater and fiddle with the registry to disable tracking”. It shouldn’t be needed in the first place.

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Brave (the company) has a long history of doing dodgy stuff. They are just trying to do what Google did (directing clicks to their own shit), but they’re using privacy as their marketing spiel.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    No.

    It sold out on it’s privacy promise years ago. Brave Browser CANNOT be trusted if you are someone who must ensure Privacy Preserving featurs must remain on at all times.

    I recommend the Tor Browser. DO NOT USE THE TOR BROWSING CAPABILITIES OF BRAVE! YOU WILL BE DEANONYMIZED! Likely anything you’d be using Tor for, you don’t want your browser slipping up and leaking anything.

    Personally I use a blend of hand-hardened Firefox (Via plugins), Librewolf and Ungoogled Chromium (for very rare cases where the site is actually trusted and requires Chrome to function predictably)

  • goatmeal@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Idk what the first two are, but you should be able to disable the usage ping at the bottom of privacy settings