calling Stalin a socialist is like calling North Korea a bastion of freedom, associating with people like him is why its so easy for the shitty rich people to claim we are evil
Stalin was a committed Marxist-Leninist, and oversaw the world’s first socialist state for the overwhelming majority of its most tumultuous period. He was no saint, but at the same time was no monster either. He is remembered by liberal historians as far worse than comtemporaries like Churchill who in actuality were far worse than Stalin.
As Nia Frome says, we can either distance ourselves from Stalin, and by extension the USSR and actually existing socialism, or we can fight back against bourgeois narratives about Stalin and the USSR, acknowledging their faults while being able to uphold their tremendous successes as examples of the possibilities of socialism in power. Historical nihilism, and throwing Stalin and by extension much of the early soviet union under the bus, was ultimately what allowed for liberalization within the USSR and partially contributed to the death of socialism in eastern Europe.
Demystifying Stalin
I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy.
Stalin's Major Theoretical Contributions to Marxism
I have come to communism because of daddy Stalin and nobody must come and tell me that I mustn’t read Stalin. I read him when it was very bad to read him. That was another time. And because I’m not very bright, and a hard-headed person, I keep on reading him. Especially in this new period, now that it is worse to read him. Then, as well as now, I still find a Seri of things that are very good.
As for the DPRK, it isn’t a utopia, but it’s also a democratically controlled country. It has 3 major parties in power, the WPK has the broad majority of control while a social democratic party and a religious party also hold minor aspects of control. They have worker councils that allow for democratic decision making, and people for the most part have their needs taken care of by the socialist system they have. The DPRK is poor, but despite that achieve far greater metrics than peer countries at similar levels of wealth and development thanks to their socialist system.
I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion. The famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits.
Lovely.
The 1930s famine, on the other hand, wasn’t forced, though. It was a combination of adverse weather conditions leading to lower crop yields, wealthy farmers called kulaks killing their livestock and burning their crops to “resist collectivization,” and some degree of mismanagement. It’s important to recognize that pre-1930s, Eastern Europe had regular famines as well, and that following collectivization the 1930s famine was the last famine outside of World War II (when the Nazis took Ukraine, the USSR’s breadbasket). To pin that on Stalin alone is a serious mistake.
My opinions are absolutely sane. My views are shared by orgs like PSL, FRSO, the Black Panther Party, and every major communist party in power throughout the world. Contrary to your pessimism, socialism is succeeding throughout the world, and we are progressing despite your protestations. I don’t “idealize failure” or “worship dictators,” I’m a practicing communist that organizes in real life and studies theory, even making my own intro Marxist-Leninist reading list. The “true” communism is the work of communists in real life building it, not the magic utopia free from sin that exists in your head.
I suggest you actually join an org and start reading theory.
wealthy farmers you say? doesn’t sound like communism to me. And I knew you would try to say “oh it wasn’t stalins fault” so I held off on him murdering thousands of his political opposition.
You worship a dictator and try to cover up the past, pretending like he did not do horrible things. Please point to where socialism is succeeding because I’m pretty sure it is in places that don’t worship a mass-murderer.
I suggest you start reading history.
calling Stalin a socialist is like calling North Korea a bastion of freedom
Which end of Korea hosted the anti-Japanese resistance movement, again? Which end of Korea is still filthy with Japanese collaborators and their heirs and benefactors to this day? What was the Bodo League Massacre and how did it instigate the war? Which country held parliamentary elections starting in 1948, free from the influence of an outside occupying government? What is Juche and how did it inform redevelopment following the war? Which country spends more on its military by a factor of 8x, primarily through grants and loans from its allies?
After Mr. Jang, the North Korean “defectors” are given time to speak. The most notable thing about both of them is that they both wish to return to the North. With the South so often being portrayed as a land of milk and honey when compared to the North the fact that the “defectors” wish to return, expeditiously, does again speak to the narratives about the North not being wholly accurate.
Mrs. Kim doesn’t discuss much about the North outside of missing her family, most notably her daughter. Her tragedy, being kidnapped, forced to remain in the south, attempting suicide multiple times, and forced to carry on is one of the most heart-rending testimonials from a “defector”.
Mr. Choi is a bit of the opposite, he too is a tragic case, as he’s still extremely loyal to the North. He’s an open and avowed communist and Korean nationalist. He speaks with pride of his country but does acknowledge economic hardship is what drove him to China, which in turn led to him being in the South. His passion for his homeland shines through and stands in stark contrast to the common narrative from other defectors.
ah yes “one side sucks so clearly that means the other side is absolutely perfect” you are fucking disgusting, people like who are why we never get any progress. You idealize tyranny and oppression because you have been lied to and told it is communism while true communists cannot get anywhere because of filth like you celebrating nations that murder anyone who has an opinion.
one side sucks so clearly that means the other side is absolutely perfect
It’s funny to hear liberals defend the genocidal members of the Democratic Party by insisting “we can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good”.
But when you’re a guerrilla resistance fighting of the Japanese at their most bloodthirsty, or a country that’s painstakingly recovering after suffering more bombings in a year than all of Europe suffered in four, the bar gets raised through the roof.
You idealize tyranny and oppression
You are living under a totalitarian regime right now, you big dummy. You don’t seem to mind.
lmao you think I’m defending the genocidal losers who only still have any power because half the country is worse than them, this country is a shitshow, but worshiping dictators will not fix it. If you want actual change you need to push for progress instead of idealizing a shit past, grow up.
wow amazing argument clearly you are very intelligent. Meanwhile you are actively defending North Korea a nation that will kill its citizens for just trying to leave
calling Stalin a socialist is like calling North Korea a bastion of freedom, associating with people like him is why its so easy for the shitty rich people to claim we are evil
It’s also like…
Calling january 6 funny
Calling russians humans
Calling tankman a video
Calling nordstream 2 sabotaged by usa
Calling moldovan elections rigged by the eu
They’re all provably true, yet liberals will always lie about them.
abandoning someone because our class enemies lie about them is one of many reasons why the western left is so fucking useless
Stalin was a committed Marxist-Leninist, and oversaw the world’s first socialist state for the overwhelming majority of its most tumultuous period. He was no saint, but at the same time was no monster either. He is remembered by liberal historians as far worse than comtemporaries like Churchill who in actuality were far worse than Stalin.
As Nia Frome says, we can either distance ourselves from Stalin, and by extension the USSR and actually existing socialism, or we can fight back against bourgeois narratives about Stalin and the USSR, acknowledging their faults while being able to uphold their tremendous successes as examples of the possibilities of socialism in power. Historical nihilism, and throwing Stalin and by extension much of the early soviet union under the bus, was ultimately what allowed for liberalization within the USSR and partially contributed to the death of socialism in eastern Europe.
Demystifying Stalin
[8 min]
[6 min]
[30 min]
[16 min]
[42 min]
[38 min]
[9 min]
[5 hr 51 min]
[5 hr 25 min]
Stalin's Major Theoretical Contributions to Marxism
Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR
Dialectical and Historical Materialism
History of the CPSU (B)
The Foundations of Leninism
Marxism and the National Question
As for the DPRK, it isn’t a utopia, but it’s also a democratically controlled country. It has 3 major parties in power, the WPK has the broad majority of control while a social democratic party and a religious party also hold minor aspects of control. They have worker councils that allow for democratic decision making, and people for the most part have their needs taken care of by the socialist system they have. The DPRK is poor, but despite that achieve far greater metrics than peer countries at similar levels of wealth and development thanks to their socialist system.
Removed by mod
He starved all of india, that’s, like 1000 million people.
Sounds like you need to learn more about Churchill, because he was responsible for starving millions of people in Bengal. He had this to say:
Lovely.
The 1930s famine, on the other hand, wasn’t forced, though. It was a combination of adverse weather conditions leading to lower crop yields, wealthy farmers called kulaks killing their livestock and burning their crops to “resist collectivization,” and some degree of mismanagement. It’s important to recognize that pre-1930s, Eastern Europe had regular famines as well, and that following collectivization the 1930s famine was the last famine outside of World War II (when the Nazis took Ukraine, the USSR’s breadbasket). To pin that on Stalin alone is a serious mistake.
As for the DPRK, they have approval-based voting, and 3 political parties. There are also factory councils for direct worker management. On top of this, they have been strong allies to Palestine, Cuba, South Africa, and had close ties to the Black Panther Party.
My opinions are absolutely sane. My views are shared by orgs like PSL, FRSO, the Black Panther Party, and every major communist party in power throughout the world. Contrary to your pessimism, socialism is succeeding throughout the world, and we are progressing despite your protestations. I don’t “idealize failure” or “worship dictators,” I’m a practicing communist that organizes in real life and studies theory, even making my own intro Marxist-Leninist reading list. The “true” communism is the work of communists in real life building it, not the magic utopia free from sin that exists in your head.
I suggest you actually join an org and start reading theory.
wealthy farmers you say? doesn’t sound like communism to me. And I knew you would try to say “oh it wasn’t stalins fault” so I held off on him murdering thousands of his political opposition.
You worship a dictator and try to cover up the past, pretending like he did not do horrible things. Please point to where socialism is succeeding because I’m pretty sure it is in places that don’t worship a mass-murderer. I suggest you start reading history.
Thank you for sharing these resources, bless you
No problem comrade! 🫡
Which end of Korea hosted the anti-Japanese resistance movement, again? Which end of Korea is still filthy with Japanese collaborators and their heirs and benefactors to this day? What was the Bodo League Massacre and how did it instigate the war? Which country held parliamentary elections starting in 1948, free from the influence of an outside occupying government? What is Juche and how did it inform redevelopment following the war? Which country spends more on its military by a factor of 8x, primarily through grants and loans from its allies?
I’m sure you could talk shit about North Korea for hours, days even, based on what your tabloid press has punched into your ears. I gotta wonder if you’ve even once heard how North Korean expats arrive in the South or are treated by their “liberators”.
ah yes “one side sucks so clearly that means the other side is absolutely perfect” you are fucking disgusting, people like who are why we never get any progress. You idealize tyranny and oppression because you have been lied to and told it is communism while true communists cannot get anywhere because of filth like you celebrating nations that murder anyone who has an opinion.
Talks about progress - Denies churchill’s genocide.
I don’t want your “progress”, kkkolonizer
It’s funny to hear liberals defend the genocidal members of the Democratic Party by insisting “we can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good”.
But when you’re a guerrilla resistance fighting of the Japanese at their most bloodthirsty, or a country that’s painstakingly recovering after suffering more bombings in a year than all of Europe suffered in four, the bar gets raised through the roof.
You are living under a totalitarian regime right now, you big dummy. You don’t seem to mind.
lmao you think I’m defending the genocidal losers who only still have any power because half the country is worse than them, this country is a shitshow, but worshiping dictators will not fix it. If you want actual change you need to push for progress instead of idealizing a shit past, grow up.
If the shoe fits
wow amazing argument clearly you are very intelligent. Meanwhile you are actively defending North Korea a nation that will kill its citizens for just trying to leave
You’re idealizing a shit past with your fucking churchill whitewashing
These people are unhinged I’m just not gonna engage anymore for my mental health.
It’s amazing watching Reddit shit libs come to Lemmy and have existential crisis about encountering beliefs they disagree with.
It’s amazing watching tankie jerkers automatically assume they know exactly who people are within 2 seconds of talking to them.