how much money does google make? billions of dollars a year
most of it comes from manipulating your opinion, one way or another.
The worst is when rich people interview other rich people about their rich person thing (e.g. Ivanka Trump purchasing an island), so that poor people can watch it on television. That level of narcissism and arrogance is just fucking astonishing to me. You can be rich and also just shut the absolute fuck up about it.
Seeing some of the wealthy crying on camera, saying they’ll flee because of a tax, that it’s a nightmare scenario, that it’s akin to a racist slur to tax the rich…
On an unrelated note, did you know that during the french revolution, guillotines were used?
I don’t get it either bit poor people even love to watch this, thinking rich people are still normal people with normal problems… Lets not forget though that rich people are not our main concern. It’s the obscenely rich people that need some obscene defunding.
My eyes were practically bleeding while watching some local news coverage at a bar, fairly recently.
It was literally two geriatric fascists in cowboy hats yelling at each other over the image of a young black man with facial tattoos in an orange prison jumpsuit. The debate was whether the local PD had gone woke and become complicit in street crime or just needed another zillion dollars of additional funding to fight the urban menace.
A lot of the people doing it aren’t even rich anymore. It’s a Ponzi scheme of influencers vying for social capital that can’t actually be cashed in for anything
Thanks Frieren!
Frieren should do to rich people what she does to demons!
Theyre one and the same
Sports coverage is not news; there’s always a sports segment in every ‘news’ program. Entertainment masquerading as news. Kill Rupert Murdoch and his progeny.
this makes me sad because newspaper people are not rich at all
city desk editors and reporters and photojournalist and fact checkers are poverty wage jobs.
they are not the rich.
they’re the stenographers for the rich
It’s almost like wage labor is a form of servitude to the owners of the means of production under capitalism.
Dosn’t matter, they have to do what the people who own the newspaper tell them to do. And those are rich.
The existence of “Earned Media” implies and proves the existence of “Unearned Media” (the rich and privileged paying other rich and privileged people)
deleted by creator
Reuters
reuters is not as neutral as you seem to think it is. i’ve seen people name the associated press too, but they are just as representative of bourgeois interests.
If we discarded every source that had a liberal or capitalist slant, we would effectively have to stop reading 99% of Western media, and we’d be blinding ourselves to the narrative of the ruling class. We are adults with functioning brains and the capacity for critical analysis. We should be able to read a piece of liberal slop, identify the ideological framing, strip it away, and analyze the material conditions they are reporting on or trying to obscure.
You need to read the Wall Street Journal because it is the mouthpiece of the ruling class that tells you exactly what capital is thinking, what they are afraid of, and how they are strategizing to protect their interests. You cannot effectively dismantle an argument if you refuse to understand its internal structure and logic.
Running away from information because it doesn’t align with their worldview is what liberals do when they retreat into their MSNBC bubbles. We should be secure enough in our own position to read sources we abhor, understand them, and approach their claims from a position of knowledge. Ruthless criticism of all that exists includes reading sources like the wsj.
deleted by creator
That’s not what I’m saying at all. The first step to my perspective is to consider the framing they’re using and to think why they want to push a particular narrative. Nowhere did I say anything about assuming they’re being truthful. Although, in most cases western media uses more sophisticated techniques for distorting information than outright lying. It will be omission of facts, framing, and so on. This is an excellent book dissecting how US propaganda actually works. https://november8ph.ca/psychological-warfare-in-the-strategy-of-imperialism-v-l-artemov/
And you should also widen your media diet to include non western sources. These will have different biases and framings which you can contrast with what western media reports.
deleted by creator
“you should read wider than western media”
“Yeah, that’s why I read this western media outlet”
Bruh
You do realize Reuters has a strong western bias as well?
But not your bit, right?
Ah yes, me a famously rich person.
Cmon, we both know I didn’t refer to that
What are you referring to?
The socialist who posts a lot of news posts this. It’s not really that hard of a joke to get
Yogthos isn’t telling poor people to blame each other, but that the working classes need to collectively fight the bourgeoisie.
But he is spreading the message of the rich [news].
Are you suggesting that learning about current events is only something the rich should do?
“news” could be any new information over any medium and is as old as language and gossip and culture itself
The News™ is a manufactured product designed to control the masses
Are you suggesting we should just never post or discuss either?
