when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 4 days ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square262linkfedilinkarrow-up1168file-text
arrow-up1168message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 4 days agomessage-square262linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSmeagol666@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days ago“It’s called ‘inter-species erotica’, Fuck-o.”
minus-squarewhen@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoThe question is on social acceptance of killing innocent animals while condemning zoophila. How come murder of innocent accepted but rape is considered a sin? Should we not come to an ideal conclusion and stop both?
minus-square__hetz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoThey weren’t replying seriously. It’s a reference to the film “Clerks II.”
“It’s called ‘inter-species erotica’, Fuck-o.”
Kelly can be a guy’s name too! Hooooo
The question is on social acceptance of killing innocent animals while condemning zoophila. How come murder of innocent accepted but rape is considered a sin? Should we not come to an ideal conclusion and stop both?
They weren’t replying seriously. It’s a reference to the film “Clerks II.”