Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

  • when@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Consent is the core concept which makes assisted suicide different from murder. So, consent is eligible in both sexual manner and matter of existence. We didn’t ask for animals’ consent before raping or killing them.

    • sunsofold@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Assisted suicide is suicide, performed by the dying individual. Assisting in a suicide is enabling a killing, but is not murder if done correctly. The one performing suicide is the active party, not simply granting consent to the actions of another.

      To bring things back to the original point, rape and murder are covered by different ethical principles. Consent has no bearing on murder. Consent is definitive for rape.

      • when@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        In assisted suicide, people consent to die a dignified death on paper and after government’s approval further medical procedures are performed by the professionals. I don’t see any problem here. Similarly I would have no problem with humans killing animals if animals start consenting to be killed. That’s not the case. Whole social acceptance of killing of innocent animals and condemnation of rape feels like a show were Murderers are pointing out fingers at the rapists with the sense of moral superiority.

        • sunsofold@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Assisted suicides do not consent to die. They request to die. They initiate the process themselves rather than allow the desire of others to dictate events. There is a subtle but important distinction.