The model was broken by publishers, not consumers. Releasing early access without an actual roadmap or intention to ever release fully has become was too normal. So of course early access has lost its meaning
someone in this thread with some damn sense finally
I am fine with early access as long as the price is reflective of ‘the game it is’ instead of ‘the game it could be’.
The problem them is all the people that complain and review bomb when the price goes up for 1.0.
The reality is gamers complain too fucking much about every and anything.
Too many people listen to complaining
Unironically, I blame Redlettermedia blowing up with the Mr. Plinkett reviews They were obviously doing a bit with a parody of cranky old men who complain about their niche interests, but it got out of hand
Maybe they should have the full price listed during early access so all that happens is the discount goes away for hard launch
I don’t fuck with early access products that aren’t free. I’m not paying for something that’s unfinished.
People just buy an early access game like they buy a normal game and treat it like that’s the game."
Too many times, that ends up being the truth anyway because the game doesn’t see much additional development…
TBH I’m a bit burned out from early access anyway, even if the game is actually good at 1.0 I just don’t want to play unfinished games all the time, it’s annoying to replay the first part multiple times, when it’s the type of game I’d play through exactly once (which is most games that I play).
There’s no such thing as early access. If anyone can buy and play the game, then that’s a release.
I mean it’s an open beta.
ur an open beta
No you’re a towel.
Entirely different thing. An open beta is free.
No, free open betas are free. Open beta just means it’s not an invite beta.
deleted by creator
No, a public open beta is public which implies free, open meaning not by invite and beta meaning pre release. An open beta just means not by invite pre release.
If you’re paying for access to a game, the game is released. Available for purchase.
Nope. Paid invite betas have been a thing since the early days of mmo’s at the very very least.
It lost its meaning long ago when early access did not have buyer protection after a length of time that gave the option for refunds, so more people treated them as games to be viewed as regular releases you buy if you are happy with its current state.
People just buy an early access game like they buy a normal game and treat it like that’s the game.
Yeah, because devs release an early access game then treat it like that’s the game.
So many people buying into early access titles do not realize how many games never get released regardless how much work was already put into them, and because of a lot more reasons than “we ran out of money”. Personal health of the main dev, disagreements within a dev team, financial issues, Real Live™ happening, hardware failure and data loss and so on can all stop a project before it can get a 1.0 release. Before early access, these titles simply never appeared on the market, preventing people getting burnt.
I think early access has helped to bring more projects to a final 1.0, but financing is just one part of the equation, and many gamers do not realize that. I only buy EA titles that are very obviously passion projects that have had regular and meaningful updates for a while and have a realistic roadmap that doesn’t suffer from feature creep. Everything else i am interested in, i simply wait - better to pay 10 bucks more for a finished project than 10 bucks less for something that never will get finished.
Its partly why for our indie title hermertia wars we are making playtests free and ubiquitous on our steam page instead of launching as early access ;)
At least those games are marked as Early Access. I personally do not treat Early Access games as normal and in most cases wait until they get a version 1.0 release. This is much better than a fake v1.0 release of AAA games.
One of my favourite games is also experiencing this right now. It was released in early access and people were complaining on day one about there being not enough content and some are still complaining after only the second update. Like, come the fuck on.
Ironic considering Palworld spent quite a while in EA and still came out of it as a buggy poorly optimized mess.
Don’t get me wrong, the gameplay is fun, but it is not smooth. One week in they killed all custom resolutions because a little bit of Japanese text would crash the game FFS.
Honestly I’ve never understood the early access program except as a cash grab.
For indie devs it makes sense, community feedback will help them as they can’t possibly do all of the testing and brainstorming themselves (particularly with a single dev). Other than that? Yeah, it’s a cash grab.
It’s intended as an open collaborative system. Small developers get an early injection of cash to fund further development. They can also get continuous feedback, from the community, as they develop. For smaller companies, this can be critical to help keep them on the path that makes the game better.
In turn, the community gets to have a say in how the game is shaped. They also get to play it early and watch it grow. It’s often also cheaper to buy early.
When used right, it’s awesome. Unfortunately it gets abused a bit right now. Bigger companies using it as a bug fixing tool is problematic, particularly when priced at full price. Also some (intentionally or not) do a “take the money and run”.
7 Days to die, valheim, and satisfactory are examples of early access done right.
Similarly, Asetto Corsa Rally doesn’t have much content yet, but is a banger nevertheless. and given the company, one can expect it to grow and improve i think.
Hold on, Satisfactory? Wasn’t that game on kickstarter with crowd funding promising a steam release to backers, and then released as an epic exclusive for a year?
Windrose seems to be one of the latest scams. They haven’t updated their game in months, and it’s just the very first release.
What do you meant haven’t updated the game in months?
They’ve been patching stuff about once a month and posted a preview for the next update not that long ago
Windrose seems to be one of the latest scams. They haven’t updated their game in months, and it’s just the very first release.
According to SteamDB: https://steamdb.info/app/3041230/patchnotes/
- Steam Recent Reviews: Mostly Positive (1,055)
- Steam Post: August 28 (13 days ago) https://steamcommunity.com/app/3041230/eventcomments/586184264603909700/
- SteamDB Rating: 85.48%
- SteamDB Last Update: Aug 25, 2026 (16 days ago)
No additional account required, no Denuvo, no additional launcher, price is 30 Euros. People generally seem to like it. I fail to understand how this is seen as a scam.
I like it so far. Combat is a little frustrating but i’m excited to check back in on it later on.
Ah dang I had that on my wishlist. :-/
Nah, don’t listen to them. They’ve been cooking. Game development takes time, the game has been released for less than a year, a big update is coming.
I had my fun with it. They should have just made the game shorter. And you know… Not promised so much.
╮(︶▽︶)╭ stop hosting in Steam
Bro I aint coming to another market for your game, you come to the consumer lmao
Valve’s the consumer, not you.
Well if valve is the one paying the developer for the game I guess I just top up gabes beer fund.











