No? China has a communist government over a socialist system. The working classes run the state, and social ownership is the principal aspect of its economy. Fascism would be a bourgeois-run state with private ownership supplemented by state control.
Let me guess: you listened to a German christian fundamentalist, who has never set a foot on Xinjiang, hallucinate lies about Uygurs in concentration camps?
The term was used to show how, through development, future structures “rhyme” with those in the past. Early communalism, as I prefer to call it, shares in common with communism classless, stateless, and moneyless society, but the key difference is the scale and the level of development of the productive forces. The sheer difference in what we use to produce what we need, and how we distribute it, makes these entirely distinct modes of production and distribution.
Communism is I think fragile. When it works then not so much but it’s almost impossible to build that big and stable community.
China has a communist government and they seem to be doing fine, no?
China has a fascist government that cosplays as communist.
You clearly don’t understand what fascism means, nor are you familiar with how China operates at any level
In what way is China “fascist”?
No? China has a communist government over a socialist system. The working classes run the state, and social ownership is the principal aspect of its economy. Fascism would be a bourgeois-run state with private ownership supplemented by state control.
Oh, so the fascism one is the United States.
Better not tell conservatives. Jk, as if they’d think about this comment.
Only one of those two countries has concentration camps, and it aint china
Yes, the US is fascist.
Let me guess: you listened to a German christian fundamentalist, who has never set a foot on Xinjiang, hallucinate lies about Uygurs in concentration camps?
Removed by mod
oh wow, could’ve fooled me! which one is it then? or have you hallucinated some brand new baseless accusations?
Removed by mod
real original, buddy. the fact you can’t even stand behind your accusation tells a lot about it, tbh
Communism has not existed yet, so I see no reason for you to believe it to be almost impossible to build.
Primitive communism existed for hundreds of thousands of years though.
The term was used to show how, through development, future structures “rhyme” with those in the past. Early communalism, as I prefer to call it, shares in common with communism classless, stateless, and moneyless society, but the key difference is the scale and the level of development of the productive forces. The sheer difference in what we use to produce what we need, and how we distribute it, makes these entirely distinct modes of production and distribution.