I already explained to you in that thread before you got banned. Which is what you then kept doing anyway. You are free to dig that up yourself. It’s in your post history after all since you remember it oh so much
Pretty sure you didn’t. If I recall correctly it was circular and increasingly stretchy logic. In fact I don’t think you ever called me a fascist?
It’s been a while; of course I don’t remember it “oh so much.”
I did explain it, it was you prodding and prodding with repeated questions to hope I eventually would make a mistake arguing with you, for you to then go in and focus only on that mistake, ignoring everything else. That’s what you lot do.
And I am telling you to go back to that post yourself, you can go into your own post history, I do not care for it.
OK, I don’t care because you’ve already had accusations that were proven wrong despite you refusing to bring any proof yourself. And instead you just backtrack and double down.
No, that’s you altering reality in your mind. You did more than that.
How so? Kindly sum up for those who are apparently not interested in digging themselves and me who apparently doesn’t understand.
I already explained to you in that thread before you got banned. Which is what you then kept doing anyway. You are free to dig that up yourself. It’s in your post history after all since you remember it oh so much
Pretty sure you didn’t. If I recall correctly it was circular and increasingly stretchy logic. In fact I don’t think you ever called me a fascist?
It’s been a while; of course I don’t remember it “oh so much.”
I did explain it, it was you prodding and prodding with repeated questions to hope I eventually would make a mistake arguing with you, for you to then go in and focus only on that mistake, ignoring everything else. That’s what you lot do.
And I am telling you to go back to that post yourself, you can go into your own post history, I do not care for it.
Pretty sure you’re lying or at the very least mischaracterizing what I said.
No I am not, this is not the first time I see this behaviour.
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat – the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies.
OK, I don’t care because you’ve already had accusations that were proven wrong despite you refusing to bring any proof yourself. And instead you just backtrack and double down.