Wahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agoFDA Bans Red Dye 3 in Foods, Linking It to Cancer in Rats - The New York Times (paywall free)archive.phexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkFDA Bans Red Dye 3 in Foods, Linking It to Cancer in Rats - The New York Times (paywall free)archive.phWahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·3 months agoSure it might cause cancer but they don’t have to stop using it for at least a couple more years.
minus-squareicecreamtaco@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoFood companies can’t redesign all their recipes in one day
minus-squarepiecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoEither it’s bad enough to ban and should be immediately banned, or it isn’t really that bad and shouldn’t be banned.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoEither it’s perfect, or it’s not worth improving. Do you hear how that sounds?
minus-squareJohn Richard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 months agoI mean 2 years is a lot of time for people to get cancer, but I see your point that companies should be allowed to give people cancer for 2 years so it doesn’t hurt their profits.
Sure it might cause cancer but they don’t have to stop using it for at least a couple more years.
Food companies can’t redesign all their recipes in one day
Either it’s bad enough to ban and should be immediately banned, or it isn’t really that bad and shouldn’t be banned.
Either it’s perfect, or it’s not worth improving.
Do you hear how that sounds?
I mean 2 years is a lot of time for people to get cancer, but I see your point that companies should be allowed to give people cancer for 2 years so it doesn’t hurt their profits.