• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    With OpenAI being at the center of the AI hype, I would’ve thought they’d be raking in the dough instead of losing $5 billion. So it’s really just Nvidia making money on this bullshit, huh? It’ll hurt when the hype dies down and Nvidia drops from the second top spot on the S&P 500. We’re all going to feel that one.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think this is just OpenAI marketing.

    “Insane thing: We are currently losing money on OpenAI Pro subscriptions!” he wrote in a post.

    The problem? Well according to @Sama, “people use it much more than we expected.”

    Oh no, ChatGPT is too useful to customers! Altman isn’t going to be telling any real problems that OpenAI has to the whole world over Twitter.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s because the whole thing is stupid. Is made by stupids, marketed to stupids, paid by stupids, and for the most part used by stupids. Because they’re stupid.

    There’s a pattern in there if you look closely.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or you’re stupid because you can’t use LLMs effectively, don’t understand their value, and now you’re angry because of that.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If AI cost peanuts to run, this would be a very reasonable point. But it doesn’t. It’s staggeringly expensive to operate something like ChatGPT.

        So any use of genAI has to consider the question “Do the benefits provided actually justify the cost?”

        Obviously, in a capitalist society this turns into “How can we monetize this?”, but even in a fully socialist society it would still be necessary to ask if this technology is actually providing sufficient societal benefit to actually justify the material resource cost of running it.

    • sepi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel like you’re putting it down, but for the life of me, I am not picking it up. Can you please try explaining again, but slower? Use simple words. Like I’m stupid or something.