They take the risks, they have the idea, they have special skills… them getting a significant cut from your work doesn’t seem that bad

Obviously there are always exceptions, there is always a too much

Then make your own company and work by yourself

Unless you can’t

If you can do that to someone you say you love, I don’t think you love them.

What? You have serious problems if you believe that. I don’t get what you’re saying. I’m saying using a tool for mutual masturbation (or one at a time) is the same as classical normal masturbation of each other. Both are acceptable and normal in a relationship.

Not relevant. When discussing techniques for the application of hair products, those with alopecia are not relevant.

It does when it’s frequent. Also, you’re the one making a generalization, so if you don’t specify, that’s on you

As for your last paragraph, well I don’t see any link with what I said. Unrelated

If the point was the orgasm, mutial masturbation would be faster, easier, cleaner, etc.

Isn’t this exactly what it is? “use my vibrator with a partner” either means the partner uses it or stimulates them while they do

People can achieve touchless orgasm if they have the psychological/emotional investment. If she’s not cumming, I question the relationship, not the sex.

Let’s ignore all medical and social reasons as to why someone can’t cum; it must surely be because the relationship between the two partners!

Frankly I don’t really get your comment. What I’m saying is: using a tool for sex isn’t bad as long as you’re doing it together?

What the fuck is this technique haha

they were dismissive of my feelings

At least that’s a way to filter out bad people from your life

This thread is insane 😂

That’s a point as well, but doing it the way you want doesn’t really satisfy her, so… you need to find a middle ground

It’s much more pleasant for her to do this with you, even if it’s not without a tool. That’s the important part

Monero hates BTC and it’s cringe

That’s why I wanted more transparency

Kraken has always passed the reserves tests, are audited from what I remember, and publish proof of reserves for cryptocurrencies that allow it. I don’t believe they use fractional reserves.

Saw this as well, but I would have liked more transparency from them (what went wrong…)

Weird indeed

Doesn’t make sense? They can still not send anything back to you…

I don’t like PoW so meh

hijack resistance

How? Afaik BTC and BCH now have different blockchains so BCH doesn’t have the most miners

Too many fanboys of XMR and BCH

Cringe, y’all sound like you’re coping

You love the word “retard”, don’t you?

with pos, bad actors actively punish themselves: they have a high risk of being punished and if the chain is attacked, the crypto value will fall and they’ll lose big

It is highly centraliseable according to players with unlimited funds.

PoW as well

It also gives the rich an advantage over the poor.

You get a % of what you staked. Sounds pretty fair to me. As time goes on it gets harder to catch them, sure, but it’s the same everywhere and we have a growing economy anyways. If everyone can stake, it makes it fairer. PoW suffers from the same thing, but indirectly: 2 people in the same location will have the same costs to mine, but the one who can afford 50 miners will gain 50x the amount of the other person, and will buy more more new miners

I believe if XMR requires a second layer, then it’s not well designed by default. I would be in favor of ditching PoW. It’s much cheaper to abuse it than PoS and is an environmental disaster

Why is PoS not an option for the base blockchain? Reorgs happen because a large portion of the hashrate is controlled by a single entity. Using a second layer is a bandaid fix for the current problem