• vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    You do realize I’m posting from an anarchist instance and that I’m an anarchist right?

    Being realistic and placing the blame on the individual is not supporting capitalism in any way.

      • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Brilliant and well thought out rebuttal. You almost got a whole thought out without ad hominem attacks or insulting disabled people. Keep trying and maybe someday you will be the able to make it the rest of the way.

                • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Right on cue, the part where the flustered liberal with no rebuttal just pretends like the other person is so self-evidently out of pocket that they don’t even merit a response, and also you’re not mad and are actually laughing.

            • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              also an “ad hominem attack” would be me saying “your argument is dogishit because you are a moron,” calling you a moron (much less accusing you of huffing farts) isn’t an ad hominem attack. read a fucking essay or something, clearly books are beyond you

              • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                4 days ago

                When your insult comes as a reply to an argument provided without a counter argument it’s taken as ad hominem.

                If you actually had a counter argument, the insult would just be regular cringe.

                It’s clear you have nothing to add to this conversation besides vitriol.

                  • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Such eloquent prose.

                    The brilliance of your counter arguments are truly stunning.

                    I now can only agree that I am a dumb fuck because “leeeeerooooyyyyjeeeenkins” and his sock puppet account “booty” have irrevocably proven that my argument is invalid due to unstated reasons beyond human comprehension.

                    If only I had be so clever as to concoct such insults as “dipshit” and “dumbass” I might have prevailed, and my pride could still be salvaged.

                    Alas I am a ruined by way of immaculate reason.

                • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  When your insult comes as a reply to an argument provided without a counter argument it’s taken as ad hominem.

                  Ad hominem is when you insult someone and use it as an excuse to dismiss their argument, you dumb fuck. So calling you a dumb fuck is not an ad hominem, it’s just an insult, you reddit debate lord moron. All just insults here!