Dazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1811
arrow-up1811imageNot wronglemmy.dbzer0.comDazharion@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareportuga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 month agoPhysics would be a lot simpler if all cows were spherical
minus-squarelate_list@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoI’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
minus-squaredalekcaan@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoYeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month agoEfficiently packing 17 square cows.
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThis is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again! flips syrup table and leaves
minus-squareotter@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoCertainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out
Physics would be a lot simpler if all cows were spherical
Me, an engineer: They aren’t?
I’d imagine milking them would be somewhat more complex though
Yeah, that’s why I prefer cubic cows. They’re much easier to pack, too.
Efficiently packing 17 square cows.
I do not like this
This is the Superwaffle Debacle all over again!
flips syrup table and leaves
Certainly easier to get a proper angle on 'em.
I can’t believe we’re having this argument again. Hexagonal cows when two dimensional. Uh, regular icosahedral cows in three, I don’t know the names of the shapes in four but you’ll put your eye out