Not necessarily a bad thing. A lot of new users to the fediverse.

  • jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Surprising to me that Lemmy is only at 4.3%, it definitely feels very active to me.

    • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s incredibly active. It’s not gigagigant size, like masto, but it has a userbase large enough to survive for many years without an infusion. Reddit is still censoring lemmy sites, in case anyone else is curious

  • fu@libranet.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I know this is pointing at percentages, but those numbers are still way off from whatever else I was just looking at earlier today. Like they had lemmy #2, Pixelfed #3 and loops, whatever the hell that is, at like #5. Here on the best Fedi platform, friendica, they said there were just over 2,000 active users, making loops already at 6 times larger than us. I still think we need to get ready because someday the facebook migration will come and boy howdy.

  • fxomt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Good, more software diversity is always good. We shouldn’t all just use a single software.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What am I looking at exactly? I see a cropped image, and mastodon is under 70%. Based on an educated guess and nothing more, I’m going to guess what you’re trying to convay is that in the pie that represents the total fediverse, mastodon used to account for more than 70%, and now smaller services are growing. So mastodons total pie share shrinks, as the pie grows in other areas.

    Is that about what you’re trying to say? Or am I way off?