Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson stated Sunday that the U.S. will enforce the TikTok ban unless ByteDance sells the app to a U.S.-based owner, countering Trump’s suggestion of a 90-day extension.

Johnson emphasized TikTok’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its harmful influence on American users. GOP Senators Tom Cotton and Pete Ricketts also opposed an extension.

The law does not allow the president to grant an extension without guarantees that ByteDance is actively pursuing a sale.

Johnson added there is no evidence of progress toward such progress.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is the guy that uses an app to monitor his son’s masturbation habits, so if he is against an app, you can be darn sure he’s serious

  • makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The fact that they’re not interested in selling it should tell you all you need to know about what China wants to do with it

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Nobody believes that this will be the issue that the GOP breaks from Dear Leader. Trump will extort both sides for the best deal for him personally, and Johnson will let him.

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ah, but if Johnson rallies votes behind him, he can negotiate the return of Tik Tok for personal gain, which is why everyone is there in the first place.

  • JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It will be funny as hell if out of all possible things it’s TikTok that starts this round of GOP infighting.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    What happened with Biden’s promise to not enforce it? Is that not something the POTUS can do or is this just the legislative branch posturing?

    • aimizo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Today is the last day of Biden’s presidency so he is completely irrelevant to what happens now.

      • rjthyen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        But doesn’t that make it more apparent that bytedance is in on the ruse? Shut the app down while Biden is still president even though his administration says they do not plan to enforce the ban and then bring it back the second Trump is president? (They already brought it back with a notice that thanks President Trump)

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s not about Biden, it’s about the executive branch. And the incoming dumbass has already said he’s gonna save it, so it is relevant.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It would probably be up to the DoJ to sue any app store that didn’t remove it, so yeah it’s posturing.

      Regardless, as I mentioned, the ban was to remove it from the app stores, not actually shut off functionality. Tiktok’s messaging this weekend was a stunt.