Does anyone know where this is at? I thought WhatsApp were being forced by the EU in 2024 to introduce this under the Digital Markets App? I’m googling, but am finding very little info.

It would be great if we could use Signal to communicate with WhatsApp groups. The sooner I can delete WhatsApp the better.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Federating would mean handing off chat metadata to Meta and other for-profit companies in the future.

    I don’t see how anyone excited to use Signal would like that. It very much defeats the purpose of using Signal.

  • dnzm@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If I understand this document correctly, it would mean that the entire connection somehow gets routed through Meta’s servers. I can fully understand the reluctance of other parties, including Signal, to do that, and I wonder how this is actually compliant with the DMA.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Last I heard Signal wasn’t interested in federating with WhatsApp so that initiative basically died before it was born.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It would go against their principles and the mission of the non-profit that runs Signal. They don’t store any message data on their servers (unlike WhatsApp), and WhatsApp mines as much data as they can from its users.

      How much and to what extent, I can’t say, but allowing Signal to federate would essentially let Meta start mining and storing Signal user data. Fuck that noise.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Signal declined, despite the EU bending over backwards and handing them the chance on a silver platter to become relevant.

    IMO it’s a mistake, like getting rid of SMS support was (which is far less secure than WhatsApp yet Reddit/Lemmy seem to be angry about that but glad about lack of WhatsApp interoperability?? I guess it’s because Americans don’t really use WhatsApp so it’s not a big deal to them, whereas SMS is).

    It would have been an amazing opportunity to help those that want to use Signal actually use it.

    Yes, I’m aware Meta scrapes what metadata they can from messages, but if you make this clear in Signal when you talk to a WhatsApp user then I don’t see the issue, after all it’s what they did for SMS chats yet everybody loved that feature!

    People trying Signal because it’s compatible with WhatsApp that everybody uses would lead to more Signal-to-Signal chats, and that’s a good thing.

    The Signal foundation seems to care more about being ideologically pure for its 10 users than they do about making a small compromise that leads to far more users and far more Signal-to-Signal chats. It seriously disappointed me, and I stopped my £10 monthly donation hearing that bad news. I was so invested in Signal because I thought it was a great app, but there’s no point of financially supporting the growth of an organisation that vehemently rejects growth, I was throwing my money away.

    I went from having 10 contacts on Signal down to just one after the SMS purge. I want to use this app but it’s pointless. Nobody wants to use an app that nobody uses, and Signal doesn’t seem to want any users either.

    Frankly, I don’t buy their excuse. If they were truly that ideologically pure about absolute privacy, they’d never have added SMS support in the first place! And they wouldn’t have tied accounts to phone numbers either!

    I think the reason they ditched SMS was down to development costs. Maintaining that functionality, as well as building RCS support, is far more expensive than simply cutting the feature out and trying to salvage some “it’s about privacy!” PR. I think the same is true for WhatsApp integration.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People trying Signal because it’s compatible with WhatsApp that everybody uses would lead to more Signal-to-Signal chats, and that’s a good thing.

      75% of my signal contacts would delete signal and just use whatsapp if interOp happened… I’ve already slowly lost 1 or 2 contacts a year because i’m the only one they know on signal and they either gave up or forgot to reinstall when they got a new phone

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I doubt it would lead to more signal-to-signal chats. With interoperability, they would be handing off their data to Meta, at which point users will just keep using WhatsApp as most are today.

      If getting away from Meta and other for-profit companies is no more, what will be the selling point of Signal?

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People trying Signal because it’s compatible with WhatsApp that everybody uses would lead to more Signal-to-Signal chats

      would it, though? why would anyone move away from Whatsapp if they could talk to Signal users without switching apps?

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        would it, though

        Yes? 100% it would?

        A fair amount of people don’t want to use WhatsApp, but they have no real choice because it’s practically a requirement for living in modern society.

        If you make it so they can still chat to people on WhatsApp, they can go to Signal without worrying about that.

        why would anyone move away from Whatsapp if they could talk to Signal users without switching apps?

        Why would anybody play games on Linux via proton if they could just stay on Windows? Because they don’t like Windows.

        Like I said above, plenty of people don’t like Meta, they use WhatsApp because there’s no real choice. Offer them a choice, and more will take the plunge.

        And why would anybody move to Signal if they can’t talk to anybody?

        The massive drop in users after getting rid of SMS support shows that people are willing to use Signal if they can still talk to people, but aren’t willing to use it when they can’t.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 hours ago

          why would anybody move to Signal if they can’t talk to anybody?

          why would anybody move to Signal if it’s no different in terms of privacy anymore? That’d be the consequence of interoperability.

    • verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah I also found that decision to be really disappointing. Before you could just use Signal for all your messaging and it would smartly use its own protocol if you both had accounts. Now it’s relegated to dedicated Signal users, which yeah I’ve got like 4 contacts left.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Signal declined,

      Signal’s management is similar thing that Google did to mozilla.

      They are there to keep freedom enjoyers occupied and feeling like we are sticking to daddy and owner class but in reality is a psyop. As long as edge lord are busy jerking them selves off, it is working.

      Current signal management is there to ensure that signal never goes mainstream.

      Obviously still use them as that’s they the best current offering once balanced for ease of recruitment.

      We need something better though and I am always on look out.

      Matrix and SimpleX are on my radar but let’s what market decides.

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t know. I’m having a much better time getting friends to move to telegram than signal.

    I prefer signal, but they all seem to prefer telegram as an alternative.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Just delete it now. Tell your friends that you’re moving because of all the tech oligarchs that just got handed the keys to the government and the economy. Tell your friends that Signal is run by a 501©3 nonprofit and actually cares about privacy.

    I left Meta products in 2010, and it was one of the best decisions I ever made. You deserve not to “be the product” anymore.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Unfortunately this doesn’t actually work. Even if people do try Signal, they see they only have one or two contacts, and they go back to WhatsApp.

      • Nate@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        I got my entire Snapchat gc (15 people) and a little more to switch. The key isn’t dropping an announcement of “hey I’m moving”, you talk to each person individually; starting with the most likely to switch. Then go up the line, share who you’ve already got to join if you’re met with resistance. if you save the most difficult people for last, telling them almost everyone else is already there is usually enough.

        If someone along the way has refused to move for the time being, you can revisit them later after you’ve got more people to move. I didn’t 100% nail my judgement of who would and who wouldn’t, but I was able to go back and revisit those who didn’t.

        If you can, reach out to people in person; I got a few this way. You have to express that you will not be accessible otherwise and will only be present on signal moving forward. It helps if you have a reputation for following through :3

        Likely not everyone is going to move over. I’ve accepted that there’s some people I probably won’t end up talking to ever again. I’ve got my main group over, the ones that actually respect that I want more security (and less clown-show shit that Snapchat has)

        Human nature wants to stay put, you have to have some strategy or it won’t work.

        Also a lot of people are pissed at Meta for lobbying for TikTok’s ban. Use that with the relevant people, if applicable

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And you should call them whiny, scared little babies for doing so. But I digress.

        Other people have succeeded in getting friend/family groups to switch to better E2EE options, so I believe that most people who say it can’t be done haven’t actually tried.

      • dnzm@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So they either keep Signal around and be able to talk to you, or they don’t. They don’t need to stop using WA to use Signal.

        If they don’t want to do that, it’d mean that you would have to keep WA around for the one or two contacts you have there (and only there), which is somewhat comparable, actually, if you disregard the “but meta is short for metastasis, actually” bit.

        Which one of the two it ends up being is between you and your contacts.

  • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    it requires Whatsapp to open up interoperability with other services if they request that. Signal has already mentioned in the past that they wouldn’t be interested.

  • dbkblk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have no idea, but I’m also interested. Thus said, remember that’s only inside EU. I remember that Meta said they won’t apply this outside EU.