I had ai write a python script for me that checked a directory for zip/rar files that don’t also have video files, unzip them and if it fails retry at a doubling interval. It would have taken me an hour or so, took the ai 5min+15min of me fixing it. I also had it add logging which is definitely something I wouldn’t have been arsed to add otherwise.

It isnt very helpful at my day job writing professional code though, and I dont think someone who didn’t already know how to do it themselves could make use of it.

Regarding the job application, most companies and sites are using shitty AI to rummage through the piles of resumes they receive.

The whole job application process is frankly one of the worst real world use of most technologies, not only AI

I have a workflow that translates English srt files to my desired target language. It’s a great use case bc LLMs are proficient at picking up the nuances of language translations, especially related to idioms and the like.

My take on it is that it’s just a tool, and as with most tools you can use it in a sensible way that’s positive, although many people choose not to. So as an example, I work in a creative field and I see a lot of people relying on it to do their creative work for them, which I don’t really agree with. What I use it for is kind of like an assistant to handle all the admin crap that usually gets in the way of doing creative stuff. So sometimes you have to write form letters, grant things etc. - basically formal stuff that wouldn’t require any creative thinking if you did it by yourself anyway, but still eats up time and brain power. I just give that stuff to the AI, make sure it sounds vaguely presentable, and send it off. I could also see a use case for it in areas where I’m weaker like marketing my stuff, maybe for at least coming up with an outline strategy of some sort, although I haven’t really tried that out yet.

Essentially, AI will do your creative stuff for you if you let it, or you can just use it to handle the day-to-day piddly crap to free yourself up to do the creative stuff yourself. It’s up to you really.

LLMs trained exclusively on documentation and ran locally seem like they’d be nice. Basically the next step in search algorithms. Do note that I am not talking about having an AI summary at the top of every web search page, that’s harmful.

I use notebooklm to act as my research assistant when it comes to labour law and union contract. Claude has helped significantly with compiling the chapters for my upcoming book. Deepseek has created several courses for me to further refine my skills and education.

I used it to extract thousands of rows from tables in PDFs and generate enumerations for them in various programming languages. I had to do some pre-processing with the Python script, and review all the output to make sure it didn’t screw up, but it saved me a lot of time.

I think there are many thousands of folk in fields beyond IT that use it all the time. It’s by no means perfect, but for many of us managing teams or doing boring AF admin, working with procurement, writing user documentation or trying to navigate basic system configs then it’s immensely useful.

In short, teaching myself simple stuff.

bash scripting, light python programs, fixing software and hardware issues, learning Japanese, learning other things, writing applications, all the boring stuff and stuff need extreme repetition or data mining. Ideas comes from me, work is done by machine.

1 - usually they come up with bullshit for me, no dissimilar to the seo slop.

2 - same as 1, its easier to google and at least know where the info is coming from.

3 - i will just machine gun apply to everything. they are the ones making it hard on us/themselves. i’ll let them filter their candidates.

For image gen I don’t have a good use but it is very complex which means sometimes I can just lose an hour or 2 fumbling around in a complex network of nodes.
What I found fascinating was how strangely good the results were when I created an image, then fed the result back as input, and repeated that process.
The only useful thing I used image gen for was creating references for an artist to create a PFP for me that looks rad as hell.

As for LLMs, also not really. I think about 90% of the time LLMs either give a useless or just wrong answer. I can’t seem to find the thing that LLMs are supposed to be good for. One thing all LLMs I tried have failed consistently at was finding a movie from a vague description I gave.

Inspiration for writing emails, letters, text messages. I always check what the thing wrote though.

I’d love to have an AI assistant that does shit like call service providers and wait in queue and take care of business for me

I’ve used it to help me set up a home server. I can paste text from log files or ask about something not working and it tells me what the problem is. It gets things wrong a lot, but this is the perfect low risk use for AI…for sending me in the right direction when I have no idea why things aren’t working. When it’s completely wrong, it doesn’t really matter.

The real test for AI is: “does it matter when it is completely wrong”. If the answer is yes, then that’s not a suitable use for AI.