• BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    That would be a HUGE Conflict of Interest if he was also a Government Official overseeing things like Regulation and Contracts! Intel would be his THIRD or FOURTH or FIFTH company that would rely on Government Funding!

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Imagine being a business willing to risk everything getting involved with this lunatic lol

    If businesses nowadays were people we’d have interventions for them or lock them up for their own sake.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If Leon buys Intel, then I will switch permanently to AMD or the loser is playing with the market.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s a ally reason to pick a piece of tech IMO. I buy exclusively AMD because they offer great value, especially since they support their sockets for a long time. For their GPUs, they have fantastic drivers on Linux.

      I honestly don’t care who owns them, I care that the quality is good for the price. I don’t find that to be true for Tesla, so I don’t own one. If he buys Intel, that won’t change my opinion of their products, I’ll still avoid them because he value isn’t there.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      switch permanently to AMD

      So glad I switched to AM5 on my last main gaming rig rebuild last year lol

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So he’ll pay again twice the amount of money, then run the company off a bigger cliff than it’s currently falling off already?

    I’ll heat up the popcorn

  • dfi@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This rumor sounds like a crypto pump and dump.

    Please buy Intel stock so we can sell ours!!

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If Intel didn’t have yield issues for over a decade, wouldn’t they be much further ahead than AMD by now?

      Kinda weird how their production problems conveniently coincide with what will keep them “neck n’ neck” with the competition for as long as possible.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Intel made some massive mistakes with their post 14nm nodes, they overextended and fell on their own sword.

        Admittedly what Intel were aiming for with their “10nm” node had higher density than tsmc’s “7nm” (from memory), considering the timeframe that would have been another massive leap for Intel; and if they had pulled it off AMD would be struggling like the bulldozer days.

        22nm to 14nm Intel were on fire, almost seemed untouchable for quite some time. X99 was (in my eyes) the biggest leap in the right direction and probably their best consumer platform ever released. Huge cache, moar cores, pcie lanes for days and a refresh on their latest node (6950x).

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel’s scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

      What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

      I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yep. Citizens’ United guaranteed that by allowing corporations to funnel an unlimited amount of money into campaigns.

        Just a heads up, if spending wasting egregious amounts of money didn’t influence the outcome of elections, why would people do it?

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah.

        And there’s a very good chance that Elon spends his waning years in and out of every court, trying to stay out of jail.

        Source: Rockefeller’s biography.

        And that’s actually the optimistic version, from Elon’s perspective. There’s been plenty of rich assholes in history that didn’t have to worry about the courts.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean really depends whether or not he manages to continue to succesfully own the US government. He made basically statements along the lines of if trump loses the election he could go to jail. I assume he’s betting on either the trump administration killing democracy… or being able to buy the next election too. Or perhaps just often enough that the supreme court never gets fixed.

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Yeah. Rockefeller pretty much owned the government in his heyday, too.

            And then at some point he didn’t anymore. Money can buy power, but it does run out eventually.

            Rockefeller was a lot smarter than Musk, and got a bit ahead of it with publicity stunt donations, before his influence ran out.

            Musk thinks he can achieve a better outcome by controlling the media or the courts.

            I think it’s objectively true that controlling the media does work, but I also think Musk wildly overestimates his own competence, and is in for a worse time than Rockefeller had.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mixed feelings about this as someone with a relatively (per my portfolio) huge investment in Intel. It would result, eventually, in the end of Intel. But so many dumb people with so much money keep throwing money at his crap companies so it might work out in the short term to get out with a profit.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      On the social media front Elon literally knows nothing, but it’s impossible to deny that he hasn’t helped build 2 companies that know how to manufacturer complex hardware at scale. To deny that just shows ignorance.

      So while Intel has so many problems, and there’s the whole politics disaster side of things, he might not actually cause the end of Intel from a hardware perspective.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t know that he has helped build anything. He has helped hype 2 companies.
        He did great PR when someone was managing him, but recently his PR is poison.
        SpaceX is managed by someone competent, musk has - quite frankly - little to do with the company.
        Tesla is riding the hype from before musk took off the mask. I give them 4 years, tops. If it’s not already on the way down.

        Intel needs to be run and managed by engineers. That’s what we want from core components. Not hype, not bubbles, not marketing speak, not fancy names and confusing part numbers. We want actual engineers who have thought through the implications of their decisions all the way to the end consumer. We want hardware that works and is predictable.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Tom Mueller the person who was at SpaceX at the start would wholly disagree with you and says so online, as have other people, but instead people just say they are saving face and rely on anonymous sources to say he does jack all.

          So like I said, ignorance.

          It’s blissful sure, but it’s ignorance.

          Edit: there are plenty of reasons to hate and dunk on the dude, but people love to enhance it with stuff like he doesn’t and never did do anything to make their hate seem even more worthy. All it does though is make you look ignorant.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I think the point is the stock would actually go up if Musk buys it because people think he’s a great businessman, despite all the evidence to the country. So no need to short it, just sell at the peak and duck out before he manages to crash and burn. Again.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Reads more like the investment tanked and he’s hoping for a recovery.

        Shorting sounds nice though, long term.