• Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Man, there’s way more than 52.

      He’s gonna need a Magic: The Gathering like system for all those fuckers.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, but I don’t think you’d even need to take out 52. After the first dozen or so, they’ll be more inclined to surrender their wealth and get off the list.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I agree… What is it like 10% own 90% of the stock market, 1% own 50% or something like that? Major shareholders are the real evil oligarchy… CEOs are just shills they hire to take the bullet, same as politicians but paid better… I’d love to see some playing cards for the real oligarchy… But it’s pretty hard to really track them because they hide behind corporations and shit

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Having the suit one corner and the rank in the other is going to make these a bastard to play games with. How would you hold them in your hand so’s that you can see both?

  • Korkki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Really highlights the fact that any free speech and naive western sense of freedom in these walled garden is just a button press away from being taken away and that there are no rules or standards. Whenever the owners or their friends feel even slightly displeased, annoyed or god forbid afraid the masks go off and the hammer falls.

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sadly look at email. Technically you can host it yourself but if you’re not one of the 15 or so big providers, good luck not being marked as spam before you even do anything.

        The real problem is with the oligarchy controlling everything, service or protocol. This is why Threads was/is dangerous.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          And they’ve been systematically shutting down anonymous email services.

          Load up Brave with a tor connection, and try to sign up for anonymous email. When they can’t track you reliably, even the “anonymous” services require a confirmation email or phone number.

          • TotalCourage007@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Man I don’t want a future where we doxx ourselves to just be on a PC. Its insane that parents think real ID for gaming is a good idea. Linux might be the only way to escape any of this in the near future.

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              They pretend it’s to protect us from illegal activity, but it’s really to protect them from whistleblowers.

        • Badland9085@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Somewhat unfair judgement against emails IMO, especially cause it’s the “trust list” that’s in the control of a few, with no open manner to add more people to the trust list. The protocol isn’t at fault for failing to prevent problems; it’s the ability for corporations to gain significant market share without control, before they are then allowed to put barriers down to disallow or discourage interaction between those in and out, forcing those within to stay in, while those outside to give up on others in order to gain usability.

          • TheEntity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            That was my point too, I guess I wasn’t clear enough so thanks for elaborating. The protocol isn’t at fault, but something being a protocol (and not just a proprietary service) isn’t enough if the vast majority of the market share is being held by a few corporations.